Orthology / Synteny Evidence

Inspect cross-reference orthology and synteny-block evidence.

TkA01G624900 LXL04_000258 JCVI_TKOH_00001 Gene ID Converter

Evidence boundary: TK1151 and OH-1004 are different materials of the same species. This page shows ortholog and synteny ID correspondence between two reference genomes, not a same-cultivar genome-version upgrade. Blocks are based on DIAMOND RBH plus coordinate-order anchors and can be further refined by MCScanX/JCVI. JCVI_TKOH_ block IDs are also accepted.

Global Block Summary

Synteny blocks

427

ID converter records

84884

High confidence

302

Medium confidence

125

Material	Assembly	Genes	Gap runs	Telomere scan
TK1151	`TK1151_GWHBCHF00000000`	45224	1917	0/9
OH-1004	`OH1004_GCA_047496595.1`	40057	131	0/711

Query Interpretation

Input ID

JCVI_TKOH_00007

Query type

Block ID

Crosswalk plus synteny evidence

Resolved gene

None

No rubber dandelion gene was resolved

Linked evidence

0 / 1 / 18

crosswalk / blocks / anchors

Best block: JCVI_TKOH_00007

The query resolves to a synteny-block ID. Block span and anchor genes are shown first.

Gene ID Converter Download current result

Linear Synteny View

The best synteny block for the current query is shown as a linear ribbon.

JCVI_TKOH_00007 Chr01 21189501-22179664 Chr01 152547700-153837624 mixed High 18 anchors

High Medium Other Only the first 12 anchors are drawn

The anchor table is paginated; TSV contains all anchors for the current query. The ribbon shows only a partial linear backbone of the current block.

Current Query Evidence

No ID correspondence record is available for the current query.

Synteny Evidence

Block	Query location	Target location	Orientation	Current mapped anchors	Confidence	Note
`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	Chr01:21189501-22179664	Chr01:152547700-153837624	mixed	18	High	Formal JCVI synteny block from rebuilt ID map pipeline.

Block Anchor Genes

Total anchors: 18 · Showing 1–18 · Page 1/1

Download All Anchors TSV

TkA01G083180 → LXL04_005049

73.6%

TkA01G083200 → LXL04_005040

99.4%

TkA01G083370 → LXL04_005035

96.2%

TkA01G083500 → LXL04_005035

97.4%

TkA01G083710 → LXL04_005033

99.6%

TkA01G083860 → LXL04_005029

97.8%

TkA01G083880 → LXL04_005029

83.8%

TkA01G083990 → LXL04_005029

75.8%

TkA01G084020 → LXL04_005027

99.7%

TkA01G084030 → LXL04_005027

99.9%

TkA01G084530 → LXL04_005024

100.0%

TkA01G084570 → LXL04_005022

100.0%

TK1151 gene	OH-1004 gene	Block	Identity	Coverage	Confidence
`TkA01G083180`	`LXL04_005049`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	73.6	98.371 / 99.588	Review
`TkA01G083200`	`LXL04_005040`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	99.4	97.636 / 94.542	Complex
`TkA01G083370`	`LXL04_005035`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	96.2	100.0 / 55.597	Review
`TkA01G083500`	`LXL04_005035`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	97.4	99.43 / 43.899	Review
`TkA01G083710`	`LXL04_005033`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	99.6	100.0 / 47.132	Review
`TkA01G083860`	`LXL04_005029`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	97.8	100.0 / 23.818	Review
`TkA01G083880`	`LXL04_005029`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	83.8	89.5 / 23.109	Complex
`TkA01G083990`	`LXL04_005029`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	75.8	95.455 / 24.645	Complex
`TkA01G084020`	`LXL04_005027`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	99.7	93.233 / 30.718	Review
`TkA01G084030`	`LXL04_005027`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	99.9	98.87 / 57.803	Review
`TkA01G084530`	`LXL04_005024`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	100.0	100.0 / 100.0	Strict
`TkA01G084570`	`LXL04_005022`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	100.0	100.0 / 100.0	Review
`TkA01G084810`	`LXL04_005020`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	99.2	100.0 / 91.007	Strict
`TkA01G085460`	`LXL04_005012`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	100.0	100.0 / 100.0	Strict
`TkA01G085470`	`LXL04_005011`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	90.9	90.98 / 77.679	Probable
`TkA01G085500`	`LXL04_005010`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	99.0	100.0 / 100.0	Strict
`TkA01G085780`	`LXL04_005008`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	99.7	100.0 / 91.353	Complex
`TkA01G087040`	`LXL04_005005`	`JCVI_TKOH_00007`	99.1	86.364 / 44.882	Review